Sordera, lectura e interconductismo
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Given the discredit that the Deaf Communities have had for the advancement of their own education, a brief historical and cultural review of the main works that have contributed to the educational progress of the Deaf is made. Given the scarce literature and the lack of consensus, it is proposed to classify research aimed at improving reading competence in Deaf students, based on the use of dactylology, Sign Language, written words and illustrations. In addition, some of the main features of Kantor's interbehavioral proposal are analyzed, as a possible theoretical and empirical alternative to the cognitive model, which has been predominant in past and recent research dedicated to improving or evaluating Deaf reader's level. Finally, some of the limitations caused by the omission of the described elements are exposed.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors have the right to ownership or copyright and they give to "Uaricha Psychology Magazine" the right to publish for the first time the article, as well as disclose and distribute it on the technological available media and through repositories.
Uaricha Psychology Magazine, is a quarterly publication, published by the Psychology College of the "Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo", Street Francisco Villa No. 450, Col. Dr. Miguel Silva, Morelia, Michoacán, P. C. 58110. Phone (+52) 443 312 9909, ext. 149, www.revistauaricha.umich.mx, uaricha.publicaciones@umich.mx. Responsible publisher: Roberto Oropeza Tena. Reserve of exclusive use rights No. 04-2013-070413365500-203, e-ISSN: 2007-7343, Granted by the National Institute Copyright. Responsible of the last update of this number, Computer center of the Psychology College, Ing. Erick Vidar Alva Rangel.
References
Beck, I. & McKeown, M. (2007). Increasing young low-income children's oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 251-271.
Chall, J., Jacobs, V. & Baldwin, L. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coyne, M., Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E. & Stoolmiller, M. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12,145-162.
Cruz-Aldrete, M. (2008). El estudio de las lenguas de señas. Signos Lingúísticos, 4(8), 39-64.
Dimling, L. (2010). Conceptually based vocabulary intervention: second graders ́ development of vocabulary words. American Annals of the Deaf, 155, 425-448.
Fischer, R. & Lane, H. (1993). Looking Back: A Reader on the History of Deaf Communities and their Sign Languages. Hamburgo: Signum.
Flaherty, M. & Moran, A. (2004). Deaf signers who know Japanese remember words and numbers more effectively than deaf signers who know English. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(1), 39-45.
Gascón, A. y Storch, J. (2004). Historia de la educación de los Sordos en España y su influencia en Europa y América.Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Mayberry, R. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 222-229.
Haug, T. (2012). Methodological and theoretical issues in the adaptation of sign language tests: An example from the adaptation of a test to German Sign Language. Language Testing, 29(2), 181-201.
Huerta-Solano, C. I. (2014). Enseñanza de vocablos aislados y en contexto mediante un método basado en las características de los participantes Sordos(Tesis de maestría inédita). Universidad de Guadalajara, México.
Kantor, J. (1967/1978). Psicología interconductual. México: Trillas.
Kantor, J. y Smith, N. (1975/2015). La ciencia de la psicología: Un estudio interconductual. México: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Marschark, M. & Spencer, P. (2003). Bilinguism and Literacy.New York: Oxford University Press.
Nikolaraizi, M., Vekiri, I. & Easterbrooks, S. (2013). Investigating deaf students use of visual multimedia resources in reading comprehension. American Annals of the Deaf, 157(5), 458-473.
Paul, P. (1998). Literacy and deafness: The development of Reading, Writing, and literature thought.
Boston, MA: Allyn y Bacon.Ribes, E. y López, F. (1985). Teoría de la Conducta. México: Editorial Trillas.
Ribes, E. (2001). Psicología General. México: Trillas.
Sénéchal, M., Ouellette, G. & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. En D. Dickinson & S. Neuman (Eds.), HandBook of Early Literacy Research(Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). New York: Guilford Press.
Van Staden, A. (2013). Using sign language and multi-sensory coding to support word learning and reading comprehension of signing children. Child Language. Teaching and Therapy, 29(3), 305-318.
Varela, J. (2008). Conceptos básicos del interconductismo: para entender el interconductismo. México: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Varela, J. (2014). ¿Maldita-mente? Mitos y realidades de la mente y sus sinónimos. International Journal of Interbehaviorism and Behavior Analysis, 2, 6-25.
Varela, J., Huerta-Solano, C. I., Nava, G. y Ortega, P. (2014). Entrenamiento lingüístico con personas Sordas. En G. Nava (Coord.), Aplicaciones Actuales en Psicología Educativa (pp.165-192). Guadalajara, Jalisco: Universitaria.
Walker, L., Munro, K. & Richards, F. (1998). Teaching inferential reading strategies through pictures. Volta Review, 100(2), 105-120.
Winefield, R. (1987).Never the twain shall meet: Bell Gallaudet and the communication debate. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Williams, S. (2012). Invited essay: Promoting vocabulary learning in young children who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing. Translating research into practice. American Annals of the Deaf, 156(5), 501-508.
Wilson, T. & Hyde, M. (1997). The use of signed English pictures to facilitate reading comprehension by deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 142(4), 333-341