Leisure in the culture of the hypermodernity
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article proposes a reflection about the issue of leisure experiences during the free time in the current context from the conception of a hypermodernity in course. Although it represents a challenge, because a critical-scientific discussion about the subject is still new in Brazil, mainly in the field of psychology. In this way, we argue that the theoretical differences have contributed to give vitality and support to the theme. Therefore, we introduce concepts and wider aspect application and problematization of the subject, including its disciplinary and trans - disciplinary interfaces from contemporary texts gathered through a theoretical research. Some discursive elements such as: consumption, body, leisure, work and subjectivity are articulated to the theme and related to the reflection characterized by a way of think committed with a leisure experience, here treated as a positive and transforming experience, which is originally subjective and entangles with the social world derived from the consumerist contemporaneity, responsible for conveying happiness to objects of desire. The main point of the discussion derives from the observation of what is the leisure reality in the contemporaneity, seeking to understand its meanings in a psycho-social dimension, whose scenario represented in the hypermodernity in big urban centers indicates human phenomena characterized by the consumerist culture and the new processes of subjectivity.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors have the right to ownership or copyright and they give to "Uaricha Psychology Magazine" the right to publish for the first time the article, as well as disclose and distribute it on the technological available media and through repositories.
Uaricha Psychology Magazine, is a quarterly publication, published by the Psychology College of the "Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo", Street Francisco Villa No. 450, Col. Dr. Miguel Silva, Morelia, Michoacán, P. C. 58110. Phone (+52) 443 312 9909, ext. 149, www.revistauaricha.umich.mx, uaricha.publicaciones@umich.mx. Responsible publisher: Roberto Oropeza Tena. Reserve of exclusive use rights No. 04-2013-070413365500-203, e-ISSN: 2007-7343, Granted by the National Institute Copyright. Responsible of the last update of this number, Computer center of the Psychology College, Ing. Erick Vidar Alva Rangel.
How to Cite
References
Adorno, T. W. (1995). Palavras e sinais: modelos críticos 2. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Aubert , C. L. (2004) . L ́individu hypermoder ne. Franç a: Ér ès.
Aquino, C.A.B . & Martins, J.C.O. (sept. 2007). Ócio, lazer e tempo livre na sociedade do consumo e do trabalho.Revista Mal-estar e Subjetividade. Fortaleza,CE:Univer sidade de Fortal eza. VII( 2) , 4 79-500 .
Benjamin, W. (1927/2006). Pa ssagens. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG; São Paulo: Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo.
Charles, S. (2009). Cartas sobre a hipermoder nidade. São P aulo: Bar carolla.
Cuenca, M . C. (2008). Ócio humanista. En M. C. Cuenc a & J. C. M artins (Orgs.), Ócio para viver no séc ulo XXI ( pp. 33–55) .
Fort aleza: A s M usas. Cuenca, M. C. (2000). Ocio humani sta: di mensiones y manifestacion es actual es del ocio. Bilbao, España: Universidad de Deusto.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Fluir : Una psicología de la felicidad. B arcelona, España: Cairos.
De Gr azia, S. ( 1966) . Tiempo, trabajo y ocio. M adri d, E spañ a: Tecnos.
Gomes, C. L. ( 2004). Dicionário Crítico do lazer. Belo Horizonte: A utêntica.
Mattéi, J. F. (2002) . A barbárie interior: ensaio sobre o i -mundo moderno. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
Kleiber, D. A . (1999) . Leisure e xperience a nd human development: A dialectical interpretation. N ueva York : B asic Books.
Lipovetsky, G. ( 2004). Tempos hipermoderno s. S ão Paulo: Barc arolla.
Marcassa, L. ( 2004) . Ócio. En: C. L. Gomes ( Org.) . Dicionário critico do lazer. (pp. 165-172). Belo Hori zonte: A utêntica.
Maslow, A . H. (1976). El hombre autorrealizado: hacia un a psicología del ser (2ª ed.). Barcelona: Kairós.
Maslow, A . H. (1999) . La per sonalidad creadora. Bar celona: Kairós.
Morin, E. ( 2007) . Ciência como consciencia. Río de Janeiro: Bertran d Br asil.
Munné, F. (1980). Psicosociologia del tiempo libre: um enfoque crítico. M éxico: Trillas.
Neulinger, J. (1981). The psychology of leisure (2a. ed.) . Springfield, EUA: Charles C. Thomas.
Rhoden, I. (2004). Experiencias perso nales de ocio:desarrollo de una herramienta para identificación de sus c ualidades subjetivas. Bilbao, España: Universidad de Deusto.
Rogers, C. R. (198 2). El proceso de convertirse en per sona. Barc elona: P aidos.
Saint-Arnaud, Y . (2002) . La guéri son par le plaisir. Ottawa, Canada: Université Saint-Paul.
Samdhal , D. (1991). Issues in the measurement of leisure: a comparison of theoretical and connotative meanings. Lei sure Experiences, 15, 33-49.
Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professio nals and serious leisure. Montreal y Kingston, Canada: Mc Gill-Queens Univer sity Press.
Tissier-Desbordes, E. (2004). Le s corps hypermoderne . En: N. Aubert (Org). L ́individu hypermoderne. Fr ança: Érès.
Tinsley, H.E.A . (1984) . The psychological benefits of lei sur e participation. Society and Leisure, 7, 125 - 140.
Tinsley, H.E.A.D. & Tinsley, D.J. (1986). A Theory of the attributes, benefits, an d c auses of leisure experi ence. Society and Leisure, 8, 1 – 45.
Witt, P.A. & Ellis, G.D. (1982). The leisure diagnostic battery: Measuring perc eived freedom in leisure. Society and Lei sure , 7(1) , 109 - 124.